Investigating Differences in Cataract Surgery Outcomes: a comparative study of three clinics in Fiji
Main Article Content
Keywords
Cataract, Pacific Island countries, outcome assessment (healthcare)
Abstract
Investigating Differences in Cataract Surgery Outcomes: a comparative study of three clinics in Fiji
ABSTRACT
Purpose: Access to high-quality cataract surgery is essential to reduce cataract-caused visual impairment. Post-operative visual acuity is a key indicator used to monitor the quality of surgery by ophthalmologists. This indicator, known as Cataract Surgical Outcomes Monitoring (CSOM), is used to monitor post-surgical outcomes in the Pacific Eye Institute (PEI), the Mobile Eye Clinic (MEC) and surgical outreaches in Fiji.
Methods: A retrospective analysis of routinely collected data from the PEI, the MEC and Fiji outreaches from 2016 to 2019 was conducted to investigate differences in CSOM results across the three clinics. Comparisons were made using Chi-squared and Kruskal–Wallis tests. Odds of poor post-operative visual activity were assessed using logistic regression.
Findings: Between 2016 and 2019, 4,460 cataract surgeries were performed at the PEI, the MEC and Fiji outreaches. Excluding those with pre-existing conditions, the post-operative best-corrected visual outcomes of patients varied by clinic (p<0.001). At the MEC, 6.6% of patients had poor best-corrected visual acuity compared with 4.5% of patients at the surgical outreaches and 2.1% of patients at the PEI. Using multiple logistic regression, patients at the MEC were more likely to have poor best-corrected visual acuity (Odds ratio 2.31, 95% confidence interval 1.36–3.92, p=0.002) than patients at the PEI.
Conclusion: This study demonstrated differences in CSOM results in Fiji by clinic in which the surgery was performed. Reasons for these differences are important to examine to ensure equitable outcomes, within reason, for all patients receiving cataract surgery.
References
1. Steinmetz JD, Bourne RRA, Briant PS, et al. Causes of blindness and vision impairment in 2020 and trends over 30 years, and preva-lence of avoidable blindness in relation to VISION 2020: the Right to Sight: an analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. Lan-cet Glob Health. 2021 Feb 1;9(2):e144-60.
2. The International Agency for the Prevention of Blindness. Cataract [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2021 Feb 1]. Available from: https://www.iapb.org/learn/knowledge-hub/eye-conditions/cataract/
3. Ramke J, Brian G, Maher L, et al. Prevalence and causes of blindness and low vision among adults in Fiji. Clin Experiment Oph-thalmol. 2012 Jul;40(5):490-6.
4. Brian G, Maher L, Ramke J, Palagyi A. Eye Care in Fiji: A Population-based Study of Use and Barriers. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2012 Apr;19(2):43-51.
5. du Toit R, Ramke J, Naduvilath T, Brian G. Awareness and Use of Eye Care Services in Fiji. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2006;13(5):309-20.
6. Fred Hollows Foundation New Zealand. Pa-cific Eye Institute (PEI) [Internet]. 2020. Available from: https://www.hollows.org.nz/our-work/strengthening-health-systems/the-clinics/clinic/pacific-eye-institute
7. Fred Hollows Foundation New Zealand. Fiji [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2021 Feb 1]. Availa-ble from: https://www.hollows.org.nz/our-work/countries/country/fiji
8. Fred Hollows Foundation New Zealand. Pa-cific outreaches [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2021 Feb 1]. Available from: https://www.hollows.org.nz/our-work/restoring-sight/pacific-outreaches
9. Fred Hollows Foundation New Zealand. Mo-bile Eye Clinic [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2021 Feb 1]. Available from: https://www.hollows.org.nz/our-work/strengthening-health-systems/the-clinics/clinic/mobile-eye-clinic
10. Lees J, McCool J, Woodward A. Eye health outreach services in the Pacific Islands re-gion : an updated profile. N Z Med J. 2015;128(1420):25-33.
11. Burton MJ, Ramke J, Marques AP, et al. The Lancet Global Health Commission on Global Eye Health: vision beyond 2020. Lancet Glob Health. 2021 Feb 16;0(0).
12. Lindfield R, Vishwanath K, Ngounou F, Khanna RC. The challenges in improving outcome of cataract surgery in low and middle income countries. Indian J Ophthal-mol. 2012 Sep;60(5):464-9.
13. Huang W, Ye R, Liu B, et al. Visual outcomes of cataract surgery performed by super-vised novice surgeons during training in ru-ral China. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2013 Jul;41(5):463-70.
14. Limburg H, Foster A, Gilbert C, et al. Routine monitoring of visual outcome of cataract surgery. Part 2: Results from eight study centres. Br J Ophthalmol. 2005 Jan;89(1):50-2.
15. Yorston D. Cataract complications. Commu-nity Eye Health. 2008;21(65):1-3.
16. Jiang Y, Foster PJ. Quality assessment of cat-aract surgery in regions with low follow-up rates. Lancet Glob Health. 2013 Jul 1;1(1):e9-10.
17. Shields MK, Casson RJ, Muecke J, et al. In-termediate-Term Cataract Surgery Out-comes from Rural Provinces in Lao People’s Democratic Republic. Ophthalmic Epidemi-ol Vis 2020. 2015 Jul 4;22(4):260-5.
18. World Health Organization. Informal Con-sultation on Analysis of Blindness Preven-tion Outcomes, Geneva, 16-18 February 1998 [Internet]. 1998 [cited 2021 Feb 1]. Available from: http://www.who.int/iris/handle/10665/67843
19. Congdon N, Yan X, Lansingh, et al. Assess-ment of cataract surgical outcomes in set-tings where follow-up is poor: PRECOG, a multicentre observational study. Lancet Glob Health. 2013;1(1):e37-45.
20. Aliyu H, Mustak H, Cook C. Using the Post-operative Visual Acuity to Monitor the Qual-ity of Cataract Surgery: Does the Day One Visual Acuity following Cataract Surgery Correlate with the Final Visual Acuity? Mid-dle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2017 Apr;24(2):91-3.
21. Congdon N, Dodson S, Chan VF, Mathenge W, Moo E. Improving the practice of cataract surgical outcome measurement. Community Eye Health. 2019;31(104):91-2.
22. Pahau D, Melengas S, Garap J, Brian G. Moni-toring cataract surgery outcomes in Papua New Guinea. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2006;34(9):900-2.
23. Ramke J, Brian G, du Toit R. Eye disease and care at hospital clinics in Cook Islands, Fiji, Samoa and Tonga. Clin Experiment Oph-thalmol. 2007;35(7):627-34.
24. Williams C, Szetu JL, Ramke J. Evaluation of the first 5 years of a national eye health pro-gramme in Vanuatu. Clin Experiment Oph-thalmol. 2008;36(2):162-7.
25. Lam D, Rao SK, Ratra V, et al. Cataract. Nat Rev Dis Primer. 2015 Jun 11;1(1):15014.
26. Rengaraj V, Ma SS, Chang DF. Manual Small-Incision Cataract Surgery. In: Henderson BA, editor. Manual Small Incision Cataract Sur-gery. Cham: Springer International Publish-ing; 2016. p. 1-15.
27. Shah SP, Gilbert CE, Razavi H, et al. Preoper-ative visual acuity among cataract surgery patients and countries’ state of develop-ment: a global study. Bull World Health Or-gan. 2011 Oct;89:749-56.
28. Pikacha N, Murray N. Cataract Surgery Out-comes From a Resident Training in a Low-Resource Setting in the Pacific. Asia-Pac J Ophthalmol. 2015 Nov;4(6):346-9.
29. Briesen S, Roberts H. The challenge of fol-low-up visits after cataract surgery in the developing world. Clin Experiment Oph-thalmol. 2012;40(2):119-20.
30. Huang G, Crooms R, Chen Q, et al. Compli-ance with Follow-up after Cataract Surgery in Rural China. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2012 Apr 1;19(2):67-73.
31. Ologunde R, Rufai SR. Surgical follow-up in low-income and middle-income countries. Lancet Glob Health. 2013 Sep 1;1(3):e132.
32. Cook C. How to Improve the Outcome of Cataract Surgery. Community Eye Health. 2000;13(35):37-8.
33. Asian Development Bank. Fiji Country Gen-der Assessment 2015 [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2021 Feb 21]. Available from: https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/institutional-document/210826/fiji-cga-2015.pdf?fbclid=IwAR17M4AjXf7dr_g1RKT348MMKMAEgcxCt6YhI0F0vh_lrbv0R6Tr5SvJt_I
34. Keel S, Müller A, Block S, et al. Keeping an eye on eye care: monitoring progress to-wards effective coverage. Lancet Glob Health. 2021 Oct 1;9(10):e1460-4.
35. Ramke J, Gilbert CE, Lee AC, Ackland P, Lim-burg H, Foster A. Effective cataract surgical coverage: An indicator for measuring quali-ty-of-care in the context of Universal Health Coverage. PLoS One. 2017 Mar 1;12(3):e0172342.
36. Finger RP, Kupitz DG, Fenwick E, et al. The Impact of Successful Cataract Surgery on Quality of Life, Household Income and So-cial Status in South India. PloS One. 2012;7(8):e44268.
37. Essue BM, Li Q, Hackett ML, et al. A multi-center prospective cohort study of quality of life and economic outcomes after cataract surgery in Vietnam: the VISIONARY study. Ophthalmology. 2014 Nov;121(11):2138-46.
38. Henry JA, Bem C, Grimes C, et al. Essential Surgery: The Way Forward. World J Surg. 2015 Apr 1;39(4):822-32.
39. Mock CN, Donkor P, Gawande A, et al. Essen-tial surgery: key messages from Disease Control Priorities, 3rd edition. The Lancet. 2015 May 30;385(9983):2209-19.
40. Meara JG, Leather AJM, Hagander L, et al. Global Surgery 2030: evidence and solutions for achieving health, welfare, and economic development. The Lancet. 2015 Aug 8;386(9993):569-624.
Article Sidebar
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Articles on this website and article downloads are provided free of charge by Open Access under a Creative Commons with the author retaining all copyright to the material. eg © PacifichealthDialog 2021. Except as provided by the NZ Copyright Act, no part of this publication may be reproduced or stored in a retrieval system in any form or by any means without the prior written permission of the copyright owner and the Pacific Health Dialog. Manuscripts can be used for private study but must not be used for commercial purposes.