“Wayfinding with our communities”: Manalagi and Pacific ways of knowing and being in health and wellbeing research dissemination – a critical autoethnography
Main Article Content
Keywords
Pacific ways of knowing, critical autoethnography, dissemination, Pacific health, Manalagi project
Abstract
Introduction: The role of Pacific knowledges in the dissemination of research is oft implied and rarely discussed in academia. This case study explores how the Manalagi project, a large mixed-method study investigating Pacific and Rainbow+ experiences of health and wellbeing, leaned into Pacific ways of knowing and being in the dissemination strategy of the project.
Methods: Deploying critical autoethnography as methodology, this paper uses self-explorative reflection “vignettes” from the researcher diary of Manalagi’s principal investigator. These vignettes are used to analytically explore through storytelling how Manalagi’s dissemination strategy came into being.
Findings: The Manalagi project leaned on Pacific articulations of relationality and wayfinding to share research findings with Pacific Rainbow+ communities, moving beyond mere gifting of research back to a position of intentionally platforming community members’ experiences and voices. Community connections helped transform Manalagi into a multimodal project with interdisciplinary dissemination activities as well as national and international reach.
Conclusion: This research demonstrates how Pacific ways of knowing and being are aptly positioned to help health and wellbeing research to better reach those impacted by, or who could benefit from, research knowledge. Furthermore, while Pacific research methodologies have done much to emphasise the importance of partnership, more published research around dissemination strategies for Pacific health and wellbeing research centring our people’s knowledges is needed.
References
2. Milat AJ, Bauman A E, Redman S. A narrative review of research impact assessment models and methods. Health Research Policy and Systems. 2015;13(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12961-015-0003-1.
3. Crowe SF, Watt S. Excellence in Research in Australia 2010, 2012, and 2015: The Rising of the Curate’s Soufflé? Australian Psychologist. 2017;52(6):503-513. doi: 10.1111/ap.12248.
4. Hicks D, Katz JS. Equity and Excellence in Research Funding. Minerva. 2011;49(2):137-151. doi: 10.1007/s11024-011-9170-6.
5. Greenhalgh T, Raftery J, Hanney S, Glover M. Research impact: a narrative review. BMC Med. 2016;14(1):78. doi:10.1186/s12916-016-0620-8.
6. Roa T, Beggs JR, Williams J, Moller H. New Zealand’s Performance Based Research Funding (PBRF) model undermines Māori research. J R Soc N Z. 2009;39(4):233-238. doi: 10.1080/03014220909510587.
7. Locke K, Bensky L. Invisible Women: The PBRF as a Regime of Inequality in Aotearoa New Zealand. Knowledge Cultures. 2022;10(2):52. doi: 10.22381/kc10220223.
8. Kidman J, Chu C, Fernandez S, Abella I. Māori Scholars and the University. Ngā Pae o te Māramatanga. 2015
9. Tertiary Education Commission. Performance-Based Research Fund [Internet]. Tertiary Education Commission. 2023 Nov 23 [cited 2024 Sep 15]. Available from: https://www.tec.govt.nz/funding/funding-and-performance/funding/fund-finder/pbrf
10. Leenen-Young M, Naepi S, Thomsen PS, et al. ‘Pillars of the colonial institution are like a knowledge prison’: the significance of decolonizing knowledge and pedagogical practice for Pacific early career academics in higher education. Teaching in Higher Education. 2021;26(7-8):986-1001. doi: 10.1080/13562517.2021.1928062.
11. Thaman KH. Decolonizing Pacific Studies: Indigenous Perspectives, Knowledge, and Wisdom in Higher Education. The Contemporary Pacific. 2003;15(1):1-17. doi: 10.1353/cp.2003.0032.
12. Thomsen P, Brown-Acton P. Manalagi Talanoa A Community-Centred Approach to Research on the Health and Wellbeing of Pacific Rainbow LGBTIQA+ MVPFAFF Communities in Aotearoa New Zealand. Pacific Health Dialog. 2021;21(7):474-480. doi: 10.26635/phd.2021.117.
13. Naepi S. Pacific Research Methodologies. In S Naepi: Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education. Oxford University Press; 2020. doi: 10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.013.566.
14. Fa’avae D. Vā and veitapui as decolonial potential: Ongoing talatalanoa and re-imagining doctoral being and becoming. In: Re-imagining Doctoral Writing. University Press of Colorado; 2021.
15. Pinar M, Horne TJ. Assessing research excellence: Evaluating the Research Excellence Framework. Research Evaluation. 2022:31(2):173-187. doi: 10.1093/reseval/rvab042.
16. Smith LT. Decolonizing methodologies: research and indigenous peoples. University of Otago Press; 1999.
17. Thomsen PS, Tuiburelevu L, Keil M, et al. Practising Pacific pedagogies during New Zealand’s level four lockdown: Pacific early career academics and COVID-19. Waikato Journal of Education. 2021;26:149-161. doi: 10.15663/wje.v26i1.754.
18. McAllister TG, Kokaua J, Naepi S, et al. GLASS CEILINGS IN NEW ZEALAND UNIVERSITIES: Inequities in Māori and Pacific promotions and earnings. MAI Journal: A New Zealand Journal of Indigenous Scholarship. 2020;9(3). doi: 10.20507/MAIJournal.2020.9.3.8.
19. McBride T, Coburn A, MacKinney C, et al. Bridging Health Research and Policy: Effective Dissemination Strategies. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice. 2008;14(2):150-154. doi: 10.1097/01.PHH.0000311893.80701.7a.
20. Thomsen P. Transnational Interest Convergence and Global Korea at the Edge of Race and Queer Experiences: A Talanoa with Gay Men in Seoul. Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race. 2020;17(20):411-428. doi: 10.1017/S1742058X20000247.
21. Thomsen P, Leenen-Young M, Naepi S, et al. In our own words: Pacific Early Career Academics (PECA) and Pacific knowledges in higher education pedagogical praxis. Higher Education Research & Development. 2021;40(1):49-62. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2020.1852188.
22. Teariki MA, Leau E. Understanding Pacific worldviews: principles and connections for research. Kōtuitui: New Zealand Journal of Social Sciences Online. 2024;19(2):132-151. doi: 10.1080/1177083X.2023.2292268.
23. Mafile’o T, Mataira P, Saxton K. Towards a Pacific-indigenous research paradigm for Pacific social work. In: Pacific Social Work. Routledge; 2019. pp. 209-220.
24. Fa’avae D. Giving voice to the unheard in higher education: Critical autoethnography, Tongan males and educational research. MAI Journal: A New Zealand Journal of Indigenous Scholarship. 2018;7(2). doi: 10.20507/MAIJournal.2018.7.2.2.
25. Anderson L. Analytic Autoethnography. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography. 2006;35(4):373-395. doi: 10.1177/0891241605280449.
26. Chang H. Autoethnography as method (Developing qualitative inquiry, Bd. 1). Walnut Creek California: Left Coast; 2008.
27. Holman Jones S. Living Bodies of Thought: The “Critical” in Critical Autoethnography. Qualitative Inquiry. 2016;22(4):228-237. doi: 10.1177/1077800415622509.
28. Ellis C, Bochner A. Autoethnography, personal narrative, reflexivity: Researcher as subject. 2000.
29. Iosefo, F, Harris A, Jones SH. Wayfinding as Pasifika, indigenous and critical autoethnographic knowledge. In: Wayfinding and critical autoethnography. Routledge; 2020. pp. 15-27.
30. Witt H. The soft, warm, wet technology of native Oceania. Whole Earth Review. Fall Point Foundation San Francisco. 1991:1-5.
31. Iosefo F, Jones SH, Harris A. Introduction: Critical autoethnography and/as wayfinding in the global south. In: Wayfinding and critical autoethnography .Routledge; 2020. pp. 1-12.
32. Mika C. Indigenous Education and the Metaphysics of Presence: A Worlded Philosophy (1st ed.). Routledge; 2017. doi: 10.4324/9781315727547.
33. Thomsen P, Iosefo-Williams J. Disruptions, Decolonial Desire and Diaspora: A Provocation Toward a Pacific Queer World-Making Scholarly Practice in Aotearoa-New Zealand. Journal of New Zealand Studies, NS. 2021;(33).
34. Health Research Council. Manalagi: Aotearoa Pacific Rainbow/Queer/LGBTIQA+ MVPFAFF Health and Wellbeing Project [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2024 Dec 06]. Available from: https://hrc.govt.nz/resources/research-repository/manalagi-aotearoa-pacific-rainbowqueerlgbtiqa-mvpfaff-health-and
35. Anae M. Pacific research methodologies and relational ethics. In: Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education. 2019.
36. Logie C. Imagination and Possibility. In: Logie C, ed. Working with Excluded Populations in HIV: Hard to Reach or Out of Sight? Springer International Publishing; 2021. pp. 97-115. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-77048-8_5.
37. Thomsen PS, Lopesi L, Lee K. Contemporary Moana Mobilities: Settler-Colonial Citizenship, Upward Mobility, and Transnational Pacific Identities. The Contemporary Pacific. 2022;34(2):326-351.
38. Thomsen P, Brown-Acton P, Manuela S, et al. Examining the Health and Wellbeing of Pacific Rainbow+ Peoples in Aotearoa-New Zealand. The Manalagi Survey Community Report. 2023. https://rgdoi.net/10.13140/RG.2.2.23206.29769.
39. Kaho S. Ground-breaking Pacific Rainbow+ research project aims for reconnection [Internet]. TP+; 2022 Mar 5 [cited 2024 Sep 15]. Available from: https://tpplus.co.nz/community/ground-breaking-pacific-rainbow-research-project-aims-for-reconnection/
40. Anae M. Teu Le Va: Samoan Relational Ethics. Knowledge Cultures. 2016:4(3):117-130.
Article Sidebar
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Articles on this website and article downloads are provided free of charge by Open Access under a Creative Commons with the author retaining all copyright to the material. eg © PacifichealthDialog 2021. Except as provided by the NZ Copyright Act, no part of this publication may be reproduced or stored in a retrieval system in any form or by any means without the prior written permission of the copyright owner and the Pacific Health Dialog. Manuscripts can be used for private study but must not be used for commercial purposes.