A latent profile analysis of Pacific health values

Main Article Content

Sarah Ann Kapeli

Keywords

Pacific; Health; Latent Profile Analysis

Abstract

Introduction: Pacific health models that centre Pacific values, can serve as a tool to address Pacific disparities in healthcare. In this study, we broadly draw upon the health concepts of these models to determine how Pacific values are translate across Pacific health and wellbeing. Methods: Using data from the New Zealand Attitudes and Values Study, we identified proxy indicators of common Pacific values. With these proxy indicators we developed a LP Latent Profile Analysis A to uncover subgroups of Pacific peoples based on their orientation towards each proxy indicator and their association with psychological distress. Findings: We identified four subgroups of Pacific peoples: (1) 65% of Pacific peoples identified strongly with Pacific values with low associated psychological distress (2) 18% of Pacific peoples identified moderately with Pacific values with medium associated psychological distress (3) 5% of Pacific peoples identified less with Pacific values with low associated psychological distress (4) 12% of Pacific peoples identified ambivalent with Pacific values with high associated psychological distress. Conclusions: These results suggest that Pacific values and the utility of Pacific health models are an appropriate way of framing health and wellbeing for a vast majority of our Pacific population. However, we also need to recognise the incredible diversity among our Pacific community and be understanding and accommodating of the diverse ways that Pacific peoples can express what they consider valuable.

Abstract 401 | PDF Downloads 38

References

1. Salesa D. Island Time: New Zealand’s Pacific Futures. Bridget Williams Books; 2017.
2. Statistics NZ. Pacific peoples ethnic group [Internet]. 2018. Available from: https://www.stats.govt.nz/tools/2018-census-ethnic-group-summaries/pacific-peoples
3. Ministry for Pacific Peoples. Contemporary Pacific Status Report. A snapshot of Pacific peoples in New Zealand.pdf [Internet]. Available from: https://www.mpp.govt.nz/assets/Reports/Contemporary-Pacific-Status-Report-2016.pdf
4. Statistics NZ. National and subnational period life tables: 2017–2019 [Internet]. 2021. Available from: https://www.stats.govt.nz/information-releases/national-and-subnational-period-life-tables-2017-2019
5. Sorensen D, Jenson S. Pasifika People in New Zealand. How Are We Doing? Wellington (NZ): Pasifika Futures; 2017.
6. Tu’itahi SF. Fonua: A Pasifika Model for Health Promotion [Internet]. 2009. Available from: http://hauora.co.nz/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/FonuaaPasifikmodel.pdf
7. Tualaulelei E, McFall-McCaffery J. The Pacific Research Paradigm: Opportunities and challenges. MAI J N Z J Indig Scholarsh [Internet]. 2019;8(2).
8. LeVa. Help give hope, suicide is preventable [Internet]. 2014. Available from: https://www.leva.co.nz/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/help-give-hope-poster.pdf
9. Manuela S, Anae M. Pacific youth, acculturation and identity: The relationship between ethnic identity and well-being-new directions for research.pdf. J Interdiscip Res. 2017;1(1):129-147.
10. Ataera-Minster J, Trowland H, New Zealand, Health Promotion Agency. Te kaveinga - mental health and wellbeing of Pacific peoples: results from the New Zealand mental health monitor & health and lifestyles survey. 2018.
11. Tautolo E-S, Faletau J, Iusitini L, Paterson J. Exploring success amongst Pacific families in New Zealand: Findings from the Pacific Islands Families Study. Pacific Health Dialog. 2020;21(5):216-225.
12. Wright S, Hornblow A. Emerging needs, evolving services: The health of Pacific peoples in New Zealand. Kotuitui N Z J Soc Sci Online. 2008 Jan;3(1):21–33.
13. Tiatia-Seath J. The importance of Pacific cultural competency in healthcare. Pacific Health Dialog. 2019;21(1):8-9.
14. Ministry of Health. Ola manuia: Pacific health and wellbeing action plan 2020-2025. [Internet]. 2020. Available from: https://www.health.govt.nz/publication/ola-manuia-pacific-health-and-wellbeing-action-plan-2020-2025
15. Faleafa M. Core elements of Pacific primary mental health and addiction service provision [Internet]. 2020. Available from: https://natlib-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo-explore/fulldisplay?docid=NLNZ_ALMA11351869360002836&context=L&vid=NLNZ&search_scope=NLNZ&tab=catalogue&lang=en_US
16. Niumata-Faleafa M, Lui D. A preliminary report on outcome measures for Pacific Island peoples. [Internet]. 2005. Available from: https://www.leva.co.nz/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/A-Preliminary-Report-on-Outcome-Measures-for-Pacific-Island-Peoples.pdf
17. Ape-Esera L, Nosa V, Goodyear-Smith F. The Pacific primary health care workforce in New Zealand: What are the needs? J Prim Health Care. 2009;1(2):126-133.
18. Vaka S, Brannelly T, Huntington A. Getting to the Heart of the Story: Using Talanoa to Explore Pacific Mental Health. Issues Ment Health Nurs . 2016;37(8):537–44.
19. Hagenaars JA, McCutcheon AL. Applied Latent Class Analysis. Cambridge (England): Cambridge University Press; 2002.
20. Stronge S, Cichocka A, Sibley CG. Narcissistic self-esteem or optimal self-esteem? A Latent Profile Analysis of self-esteem and psychological entitlement. J Res Personal. 2016;63:102–10.
21. Degan TJ, Kelly PJ, Robinson LD, Deane FP, Wolstencroft K, Turut S, et al. Health literacy in people living with mental illness: A latent profile analysis. Psychiatry Res. 2019;280:112499.
22. Cowie LJ, Greaves LM, Sibley CG. Identifying Distinct Subgroups of Green Voters: A Latent Profile Analysis of Crux Values Relating to Green Party Support. NZJP. 2015;44(1):16.
23. Bouckenooghe D, De Clercq D, Raja U. A person-centered, latent profile analysis of psychological capital. Aust J Manag. 2019;44(1):91–108.
24. Sibley CG. Sampling procedure and sample details for the New Zealand Attitudes and Values Study. PsyArXiv; 2021. Available from: https://psyarxiv.com/wgqvy/
25. Kessler RC, Andrews G, Colpe LJ, Hiripi E, Mroczek DK, Normand S-LT, et al. Short screening scales to monitor population prevalences and trends in non-specific psychological distress. Psychol Med. 2002;32(6):959–76.
26. Quality of Life 2008 Survey National Report. (NZ): Nielsen; 2009.
27. Sengupta NK, Luyten N, Greaves LM, Osborne D, Robertson A, Brunton C, et al. Sense of Community in New Zealand Neighbourhoods: A Multi-Level Model Predicting Social Capital. NZJP. 2013;42(1):10.
28. Schwartz SH. Universals in the Content and Structure of Values: Theoretical Advances and Empirical Tests in 20 Countries. In: Zanna MP, editor. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. Academic Press; 1992. p. 1–65.
29. Stern PC, Dietz T, Guagnano GA. A Brief Inventory of Values. Educ Psychol Meas. 1998;58(6):984–1001.
30. Sibley C, Afzali U, Satherley N, Ejova A, Stronge S, Yogeeswaran K, et al. Prejudice toward Muslims in New Zealand: Insights from the New Zealand Attitudes and Values Study. NZJP. 2020;49:48-72.
31. Gibson NJS, Barnes K. The varieties of religious nones: factor structure and validity of the non-religosity scales. International Association for the Psychology of Religion; 2013; Lausanne, Switzerland.
32. Muthén L K, Muthén BO. Mplus User’s Guide. Eighth. Los Angeles, (CA): Muthén & Muthén.
33. Mila-Schaaf K. Polycultural capital and the Pasifika second generation: negotiating identities in diasporic spaces [PhD]. Auckland (NZ): Massey University; 2010.
34. Manuela S. Ethnic Identity Buffers the Effect of Discrimination on Family, Life, and Health Satisfaction for Pacific Peoples in New Zealand. Pacific Health Dialog. 2021;21(7):390-398.
35. Ministry of Health. Pacific peoples and mental health: a paper for the Pacific Health and Disability Action Plan review. Wellington, (NZ): Ministry of Health; 2008.
36. Suaalii-Sauni T, Wheeler A, Saafi E, Robinson G, Agnew F, Warren H, et al. Exploration of Pacific perspectives of Pacific models of mental health service delivery in New Zealand. Pac Health Dialog. 2009;1(15):18–27.
37. Ioane J, Tudor K. The fa’asamoa, person-centered theory and cross-cultural practice. Pers-Centered Exp Psychother. 2017;16(4):287–302.
38. Tu’itahi S. Why Pasifika Health Models? Do They Work? (From Fonua to Fonua Ola) [Internet]. 2015. Available from: http://hauora.co.nz/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/From-Fonua-to-Fonua-Ola.pdf
39. Kupa K. Te Vaka Atafaga: A Tokelau assessment model for supporting holistic mental health practice with Tokelau people in Aotearoa, New Zealand. Pac Health Dialog. 2009;15(1):156–163.
40. Tamasese K, Peteru C, Waldegrave C, Bush A. Ole Taeao Afua, the New Morning: A Qualitative Investigation Into Samoan Perspectives on Mental Health and Culturally Appropriate Services. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2005;39(4):300–309.
41. Seiuli BMS. Uputaua: A therapeutic approach to researching Samoan communities. Aust Comm Psychologist. 2012;24(1):14.
42. Seiuli BMS. Counselling Psychology from a Samoan Perspective. NZJP. 2013;42(2):9.
43. Thaman KH. Kakala: A Pacific concept of teaching and learning. Keynote Address; Australian College of Education National Conference, Cairns (Australia); 1997.
44. Fua SJ. Ko hota fa`unga motu`a ko hota kaha`u – a knowledge system for redesigning Tongan curriculum. In: Sanga K, Thaman KH, editors. Wellington, New Zealand: He Parekereke (Institute of Research and Development in Maori and Pacific Education), Victoria University Press; 2009.
45. Chu C, Abella IS, Paurini S, Ako Aotearoa National Centre for Tertiary Teaching Excellence. Educational practices that benefit Pacific learners in tertiary education: research report [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2021 Aug 16]. Available from: https://akoaotearoa.ac.nz/download/ng/file/group-5330/fr-educational-practices-that-benefit-pacific-learners-in-tertiary-education.pdf
46. Strategy Performance and Leaning (SPL) Unit, Office of the Director-General, SPC. Pacific Monitoring, Evaluation and Learning Capacity Strengthening Rebbilib. Suva, Fiji: Pacific Community; 2020.
47. Maua-Hodges T. Ako Pai ki Aitutaki: transporting or weaving cultures. Wellington, (NZ): Wellington College of Education; 1999.
48. Hunter R, Hunter J, Anthony G. Joining the pieces of the tivaevae to enact strength-based mathematics learning for Pasifika students in Aotearoa New Zealand. American Educational Research Association Conference; 2018 May; New York, United States.